Property Settlements Involving Non-Working Parties: What Happens in a Property Settlement If You Didn’t Work?

When a relationship ends, dividing assets is often one of the biggest challenges. We often encounter the mindset “I was the income earner, I paid for everything, so I should get the lions share” But what about the partner who spent years raising children, managing the household, and supporting the other’s career – without earning a paycheck? Is their contribution any less valuable?

Under Australian law, the answer is a firm NO. The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) recognizes that homemaker contributions – like parenting, domestic chores, and emotional support – these are just as important as financial earnings and must be considered accordingly when dividing assets after a separation. Courts take a holistic approach, ensuring that those who have sacrificed career opportunities to care for the family are not left at a financial disadvantage.

Understanding Homemaker Contributions

Homemaker contributions refer to the unpaid labour performed within the home, including, but not limited to:-

  • Child-rearing and caregiving;
  • Household chores (i.e. cooking, cleaning, and maintenance);
  • Providing emotional and practical support for a working spouse;
  • Managing family finances and household logistics; and
  • Assisting in a partner’s career advancement (i.e. relocating for work, handling social obligations etc.)

While these contributions do not generate a direct financial income, they create an environment that allows the other partner to earn and accumulate assets. There is no doubt that historically, these kind of contributions were often undervalued, especially when it came to recognising and valuing what was forsaken to advance a partners career in comparison to financial contributions. In recent years, the Australian family law system has adopted a progressive approach to recognising the various ways in which a party can contribute to the acquisition of assets in a relationship – whether that be financially or otherwise.

Recognition Under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) governs property settlements after separation or divorce in Australia. Section 79(4) of the Act outlines the factors considered in property division, explicitly recognizing both financial and non-financial contributions. In particular:

  • Section 79(4)(b) and (c): These provisions require the court to consider any non-financial contributions made by each party, including “contribution[s]…to the welfare of the family…including any contribution made in the capacity of homemaker or parent.”
  • Section 75(2): This section considers future needs, including the impact of a party’s caregiving responsibilities on their earning capacity, and the ways in which this will affect them in future years.

This legal framework ensures that a homemaker’s role is evaluated alongside and not secondary to, income-earning activities when determining asset division.

How Courts Assess Homemaker Contributions

When courts assess homemaker contributions, they examine:

  1. The duration of the marriage or relationship: Longer relationships often involve significant non-financial contributions that warrant greater recognition;
  2. The sacrifices made for the family: If one partner has foregone career opportunities to care for children or support the other spouse’s career, this is taken into account;
  3. The impact on earning capacity: A spouse who has been out of the workforce due to homemaking responsibilities may receive a larger share of assets to compensate for reduced career prospects;
  4. The overall asset pool: Courts aim for a just and equitable division, considering both direct financial and indirect homemaker contributions. The Courts will generally regard homemaker contributions as having equal weight to financial contributions (in other words, financial contributions are not to be favoured).

Case Law Examples

Australian courts have consistently upheld the principle that homemaker contributions are equally valuable. In cases such as Mallet v Mallet (1984) 156 CLR 605, the High Court emphasized that property division must consider both financial and non-financial contributions. Similarly, in Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57, the court reaffirmed that a homemaker’s role is fundamental in enabling the financial growth of a family unit.

Seeking Legal Guidance – What Should You Do?

It is important to speak with a solicitor on 07 3209 7744 if you are currently in the process of separating with your spouse and are unsure of your rights and entitlements.

Reading this after hours? Click HERE to leave us a message

Latest Posts

How can i avoid paying my ex super? - Superannuation Splits & Legal Strategies
Family Law

“How Can I Avoid Paying My Ex Super?” Superannuation Splits & Legal Strategies

“How Can I Avoid Paying My Ex Super?” – Superannuation …

Read More →
Stop and think - estate law - wills
Estate Law

Stop and think before leaving an adult child out of your Will

Before deciding to leave an adult child out of your …

Read More →
Choosing the right lawyer
Family Law

Your Case, Your Cash: Don’t Let the Wrong Lawyer Wreck Both

Choosing The Wrong Lawyer = Wrong Path = Wasted Funds …

Read More →
How can i avoid paying my ex super? - Superannuation Splits & Legal Strategies
Family Law

“How Can I Avoid Paying My Ex Super?” Superannuation Splits & Legal Strategies

“How Can I Avoid Paying My Ex Super?” – Superannuation …

Read More →
Stop and think - estate law - wills
Estate Law

Stop and think before leaving an adult child out of your Will

Before deciding to leave an adult child out of your …

Read More →